After a younger Tiger Woods exerted his will with three wins in his first six skilled Masters appearances — together with a 12-stroke victory in his 1997 debut — Augusta National commenced with “Tiger-proofing.”
This was not an official stance, after all. But designers made the course more durable in response to Woods’ dominance, most notably by lengthening the Par 5s.
The PGA Tour is taking an identical tack to the Bryson Dechambeau revolution. Golfweek reported on Tuesday that the Tour has launched a brand new rule for No. 18 at TPC Sawgrass forward of this week’s Players Championship supposed to thwart Bryson’s big-bombing methods.
An announcement on the rule change from the PGA Tour, per Golfweek:
“In the interest of safety for spectators, volunteers and other personnel, the Players Championship Rules Committee has installed an internal out of bounds left of the lake for play on hole 18.”
What does this imply?
In brief, because of this Dechambeau will not be permitted to take a shortcut throughout the famed 18th’s water. He’ll need to drive the golf green similar to all people else.
Dechambeau dazzled the golf world final weekend by eschewing the extreme dogleg left of No. 6 at Bayhill final week en path to victory at the Arnold Palmer Invitational. Instead he used his huge drive to bomb his tee shot straight over the water, considerably shortening his method.
This is just not how Bay Hill architect Dick Wilson supposed the outlet to be performed. No matter. Dechambeau discovered an edge and exploited it as any aggressive, succesful professional would and may.
Dechambeau talked about Sawgrass shortcut — the Tour listened
Dechambeau talked earlier this week about taking an identical method to No. 18 at Sawgrass with an unorthodox path over the water into the ninth fairway left of the 18th inexperienced. This, as a substitute of aiming instantly towards the golf green proper of the water.
Let Dechambeau clarify:
“I have thought about sometimes on 18 going left into 9,” Dechambeau said, per GolfWeek. “But we’ll see — with the stands and everything — if it’s even worth it.”
What would be the advantage of this path?
“It just gives you a better shot into the green, I think, personally, where you can just hit it a little long and you’re always going to be OK.”
He also noted that the risk might line up to the reward.
“It’s probably not worth it. I mean, the cover’s like 310, but we’ll see. I just —I look at all options and hopefully there’s an advantage there. But if not I’ll just hit 4-iron down the fairway and hopefully an 8-iron or 7-iron into the green.”
What this seems to be like
Here’s a visualization offered by Golf.com.
“You need to get it at least 340. If you don’t hit it 340, you’ll probably have to punch out.”
Jeevan Sihota is simply a young person, however he is the one one who is aware of what it is prefer to take the unconventional line on No. 18 Bryson was planning to aim. https://t.co/V9XYPZ7nOz
— GOLF.com (@GOLF_com) March 10, 2021
Why would Bryson do that?
An splendid shot into the ninth fairway would depart a transparent, brief method to the 18th inexperienced. It would additionally take away the fairway-length water hazard that comes into play for golfers who pull out driver on the tee field.
It’s not as clear a bonus as Dechambeau discovered by chopping vital size off No. 6 at Bay Hill. And it isn’t one Dechambeau was satisfied was definitely worth the danger.
No matter. Once the Tour obtained wind that Dechambeau was even serious about, it modified the rules “in the interest of safety for spectators, volunteers and other personnel.”
It’s a disgrace. While the Tour’s panicking about Dechambeau blowing up conventional course design, it is muting the excitement of probably the most thrilling factor going for spectator golf.
More from Yahoo Sports: